Aretha Franklin and the Void of Trying to Revive Her on Screen

[ad_1]

biographer David Ritz In his second book about Franklin, “Respect,” he wrote of this distance, “Despite my determination to be a compassionate listener, my technique ultimately didn’t work, even though his gentle persistence would allow him to reveal all his sacred secrets. In the end, I didn’t cut a hole in his armor.”

“She got the book,” she said, reflecting further on her first biography, “Aretha: From These Roots,” which she penned based on interviews with Franklin, thus favoring her. he wanted. So far, Aretha sees her book as an accurate portrait.”

Franklin’s stamp is all over the movie “Respect”. He chose Hudson, a move that puts music at the center of the film but risks the appearance that Hudson’s portrayal may be too dependent on Franklin’s own image. In other words, as good as the music sounds (and sounds very, very good), the plot holes about his character’s past that seemed to inform much of his decision-making continued to nag as I watched.

Why is her mother, Barbara (Audra McDonald), raising her children with her domineering husband, Rev. Franklin (Forest Whitaker) and emerged as an angelic force in Aretha’s life after her death?

Why doesn’t Aretha remember when she had to go up on the roof and sing out loud with her sisters as a child to drown out her parents’ quarrel?

And what shame is it that the movie alludes to but, like Aretha, never wanted to face?

What does he need music to save him?

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *