Child Tax Credit Monthly Payments To Begin Soon


WASHINGTON — If all goes as planned, the Treasury Department will begin making a series of monthly payments to families with children in the coming days, marking a social policy milestone and intensifying the debate over whether subsidies should be made a permanent part of American security. network.

With all but the wealthiest families eligible to receive up to $300 per child per month, the United States will join many other wealthy countries that provide a guaranteed income for children, a goal with long moving advances. Experts predict payouts will reduce child poverty by almost half, an unprecedented success.

But the program, created as part of the stimulus bill Democrats passed through the united Republican opposition in March, expires in a year and could help or hinder President Biden’s commitment to an extension.

Sudden difficulties arise. The government is unsure how to make payments to millions of hard-to-reach families, a problem that could undermine poverty reduction goals. Opponents of the effort will be watching for delivery errors, examples of waste, or signs that money is eroding some parents’ desire to work.

Although the government increased many aid programs during this period, coronavirus pandemic, supporters, payments from an expanded Child Tax Credit an annual cost of approximately $105 billionare unique in their potential to stabilize both poor and middle-class families.

“This is the most transformative policy to come out of Washington since the days of FDR,” said New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory Booker. “America is far behind its industrial peers when it comes to investing in our children. We have some of the highest rates of child poverty, but even non-poor families are struggling as the cost of raising children rises.”

About nine-tenths of America’s 74 million children will be eligible to receive the new monthly payments ($250 per child, up to $300 for under-sixes) scheduled to begin Thursday. These payments, the majority of which will be sent to bank accounts via direct deposits, will make half of the subsidy during the year and the remainder as tax refunds next year.

Biden has proposed a four-year extension to a broader package he hopes to pass this fall, and Congressional Democrats have pledged to make the program permanent. Like much of Mr. Biden’s agenda, the fate of the program may depend on whether Democrats can unite around the larger package and move forward through the equally divided Senate.

Unconditional payments, which critics call “welfare,” break with a quarter-century of policy. Since President Bill Clinton signed a 1996 bill to “end welfare”, aid has gone almost entirely to working parents. Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio wrote recently That new payments that don’t require “work” would resurrect a “failed welfare system” and provide “free money” for offenders and addicts.

But compared to past aid debates, the opposition has so far been quiet. A few conservatives support child subsidies, which could increase falling birth rates and allow more parents to raise their children full time. Utah Republican Senator Mitt Romney made an offer. bigger child allowance, though it will fund other programs by cutting them off.

Because Congress required payments to begin only four months after the bill passed, the administration struggled to spread the word and put together the payroll lists.

Families that have recently filed tax returns or received incentive checks should be automatically paid. (Single parents with incomes of up to $112,500 and married couples of up to $150,000 are eligible for full benefits.) But analysts say four to eight million low-income children may be missing from the lists, and drivers are driving to pick up their parents. for online registration.

“Wherever you run into people — complete strangers — go upstairs and introduce yourself and tell them about the Child Tax Credit,” Vice President Kamala Harris said last month at what the White House called “Child Tax Credit Awareness Day.”

A mixture of excitement, bewilderment and disbelief unfolds among the needy. fresh EBTA phone app for people who buy food coupons, it found that 90 percent of its users know the benefit, but few understand how it works.

“Half of them say, ‘I’m really, really ready to take it,'” said Stacy Taylor, head of policy and partnerships at Propel, the creator of the app. “Others are a mix of ‘I’m worried that I’m not taking the right steps’ or ‘I’m not sure I really believe this to be true’.”

Few places need more than Lake Providence, La., a village along the Mississippi River. three quarters of children are poorincluding Tammy Wilson, 50, an unemployed nurse’s aide.

The $750 a month she should get for three kids will more than double her monthly income from food stamps alone, leaving her dependent on a boyfriend. “I think this is a great idea,” he said. “There is no business here.”

Ms. Wilson said the money would help with rent, with the biggest benefit being that she could send her children on activities like camping and school trips.

“Kids get bullied, belittle them—he says, ‘Mom has no money,’” she said. “They feel like it’s their fault.”

But in West Monroe, a 90-minute drive away, Levi Sullivan, another low-income parent, described the program as wasteful and inefficient. Mr Sullivan, a pipeline worker, had been unemployed for over a year, but argued that the payments would increase the national debt and reward laziness.

“I am a Christian faith – I trust God more than I trust government,” he said.

With four children, unemployment insurance, food stamps and odd jobs, Mr. Sullivan was able to raise $1,150 a month, but was so skeptical of the program that he went online to delay payments and get the next lump sum. year. Otherwise, he fears that if he finds a job, he will have to pay back the money.

“Government aid is a form of slavery,” he said. “Some people need it, but there are some people who just live outside the system.”

Progressives have been seeking an income base for children for at least a century. “Nobody can doubt that adequate allowance should be given to a mother with children to care for,” economist and future Illinois senator Paul H. Douglas wrote as child benefits spread across Europe in 1925.

Forty years later, the Ford Foundation sponsored a conference to promote the idea in the United States. The organizer of the meeting, Eveline M. Burns, lamented the “shocking extent of childhood poverty” but acknowledged strong political opposition to the payments.

As hostility to unconditional cash aid peaked in the 1990s, various forces revived interest in subsidies for children. Brain science showed lasting influence of formative years. Stagnant incomes have brought concerns to the middle class about the costs of raising children. More recently, racial protests have encouraged a broader view of social inequality.

An existing program, the Child Tax Credit, offered a child subsidy of up to $2,000 per child. However, since it is only offered to families with sufficient income, the poorest third of children did not fully qualify. By removing this earnings requirement and increasing the amount, the Democrats temporarily turned a tax cut into a children’s income guarantee.

Analysts at Columbia University’s Center for Poverty and Social Policy say the new aid will reduce child poverty by 45 percent. four times more than achieved in a year.

“Even if it’s just for a year, it’s very important,” said Irwin Garfinkel, a professor at the Columbia School of Social Work. “If it becomes permanent, it’s of equal importance to the Social Security Act – the bigger it is.”

Opponents warn that the policy is reversing decades of success by helping non-working families. Child poverty had fallen to a record before the pandemic (about 12 percent in 2019), More than a third decline since the 1990s.

Scott Winship of the Conservative American Enterprise Institute, arguing that unconditional help was unconditional, said, “I’m surprised there hasn’t been more response from other conservatives.” can cause weak long-term harm by reducing the incentive to work and marry.

Getting the money to all eligible children may be harder than it looks. Some American children live with undocumented parents who are afraid to seek help. Others may live with relatives in unstable or changing care.

Dozens of groups, including the Children’s Defense Fund, United Way, and Common Sense Media, are trying to promote the program, but many eligible families have failed to collect their incentive checks, highlighting how difficult it is to get them. The legislation contained little money that could be used for outreach, and many groups sought to raise private donations to support their efforts.

The head of the Children’s Defense Fund, Rev. Starsky Wilson praised the Biden administration for creating an online registration portal, but warned that “we really need to knock on doors”.

Gene Sperling, the White House official who oversees payments, said deep cuts in poverty have been made even in some hard-to-reach families.

“While we want to do everything possible to reach the missing children, the most dramatic impact on child poverty will automatically happen” because the program will reach approximately 26 million children whose families are known but earn too little to take full advantage of the previous loan. . “This is going to be huge.”

By making monthly payments, the program aims to address the fluctuations in income that poor families often suffer. One unknown is how families will spend the money, critics predict waste, and supporters say parents know their children’s needs.

When Fresh EBT asked users about their spending plans, the answers differed from those regarding incentive controls. “We’ve seen more responses, especially with children – school clothes, school supplies, toddler bed,” Ms Taylor said. “It tells me the framework of utility.”

There is evidence for this theory. when is england In the 1970s, “family allowance” changed its name to “child benefit” and paid mothers instead of fathers spent families less tobacco and men’s wear and more children’s wear, pocket money and toys.

“Calling something child benefit frames the way families spend the money,” said Columbia University professor Jane Waldfogel. studied the English program.

While the payments will greatly reduce poverty, most beneficiaries are not poor. Jennifer Werner and her husband had a household income of approximately $75,000 before quitting their job as a property manager in Las Vegas two years ago to take care of their first child. She has since used her savings to extend her time as a stay-at-home mom.

Ms. Werner, 45, supports an annuity but wants to see results before deciding whether it should continue. “When you have kids, you realize these are expensive – diapers, wipes, extra food,” she said. But he added, “I don’t know where all this money is coming from.”

He hopes the country will be fair to both taxpayers and children whose parents work too hard to pay enough attention. “If this benefit helps parents nurture their kids, that would be great,” he said.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *