[ad_1]
But three hours later he was still fighting, and after the win he spoke like a player who understood well that success on the pitch is no longer about how he wins, but whether he wins or not.
Murray said he’s been talking to his team about this for a while, and it makes sense. Grand Slam appearances since the start of the pandemic have included either an epic win followed by a quick loss or just an epic loss.
Murray and his team struggled around the idea of playing more aggressively and tried to finish points faster with more aggressive shots. But he said it risks losing more games and resulting in longer matches, especially when playing what he describes as “top 20 level tennis” instead of the top five or top two. They decided that the quickest way to victory was to play better than to be different.
“I play my style of play, but I play at a higher level,” he said. “When I look at many of my matches, like 2015, 2016, I would finish them as if I was quite productive and clinical, like when I had opportunities and I was in front of men. quickly.”
The cost of not finishing them is obvious. Two days after his marathon win against Basilashvili, Murray came straight and allowed Japanese Taro Daniel, a 28-year-old journeyman who had never finished 64th, to send him off in three sets. Murray couldn’t remember losing to someone outside of the top 100 at a Grand Slam.
“I’m really disappointed,” he said of a result that has left him questioning whether he will play another Australian Open, especially if his results at the Grand Slams don’t improve. “Slamming in the second round is not something I find particularly motivating.”
Murray, of course, wants to play once again in the second week of the most important tournaments like Nadal. Not realistic It would be possible so quickly, and at a time when figuring out how to win fast with Friday’s win as the fastest proof has never been more important.
“I made the right decisions,” he said.
[ad_2]
Source link