Grounds for Release of Bill Cosby from Prison Contested by Some Civil Courts


Of course there are lawyers who agree with him and applaud the court’s 6-1 decision, which is remarkable consensus on a difficult subject. They believe it conveys a strong message about overstepping the prosecution’s authority – about district attorneys sticking to their promises, even if those promises are false. “They were right about the breach of law because what Castor made was basically a promise,” said David Rudovsky, a defense attorney and senior researcher at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

But the “promise” remains a hotly debated topic.

Castor said, but He believed According to Constand’s account, he tarnished his credibility as a complainant by waiting a year to report Cosby and continuing to contact him after the alleged assault. He said he had decided he couldn’t get a conviction, so he promised Constand as a ploy to get some justice in the civil case.

But the word was never put into writing. The prosecutor, who led the Cosby investigation with her chief deputy, Risa Vetri Ferman, said she had never mentioned it to him. Castor pointed newsletter had announced the end of the criminal investigation as proof that an immunity agreement existed. But the newsletter doesn’t mention anything about immunity. He’s talking about the pending civil lawsuit.

Daniel Filler, dean of Drexel University’s Kline School of Law, said the average person should question whether Cosby could take advantage of the suspicion he did. “Because there is no documentation of that promise being made, just this public statement that doesn’t quite follow what Castor said,” he said.

Castor said he had briefed one of Cosby’s lawyers at the time about his plan to grant Cosby immunity. But attorney Walter Phillips was dead when the word became an issue and Cosby filed a criminal complaint in 2015. John Schmitt, another Cosby’s attorney in the original case, said Phillips had told him about it.

Castor said he was also discussing the immunity arrangement with Constand’s lawyers at the time. Two lawyers, Dolores M. Troiani and Bebe H. Kivitz, denied this.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *