OnlyFans Says It Won’t Ban Obscene Content


It is difficult to overestimate the degree. Just Fans reversed the general downward trajectory of being an adult entertainment artist.

Before subscription service arrived in 2016, so-called tube sites, video platforms that collect stolen pornographic content, distribute it for free, and suck revenue from banner and video ads, put many of the biggest studios out of business.

The rest went from paying the top performers thousands of dollars per stage, often to several hundred.

OnlyFans’ clean, modern interface has allowed individuals over the age of 18 to sell and purchase monthly subscriptions to an overly obscene stream of images and videos for Instagram. There, the power was in the hands of the people who ran their own business: A creator with a few thousand monthly subscribers could make $25,000 a month posting content while retaining full ownership of those photos and movies.

And while these creators built lucrative businesses, they built the company with them.

Industry broadcaster Brian Gross said that this is the reason why OnlyFans announced last Thursday that it will ban sexual activity altogether from October, causing some panic in the pornographic industry. He added that there is palpable sadness among his clients at a time when respect and empathy for sex workers are growing, and a business they helped found is preparing to fire them in the cold.

Then, within a few days, the company reversed its decision and In a tweet on Wednesday: “We have provided the necessary safeguards to support our diverse community of creators and suspended the planned October 1 policy change.”

“Thank you everyone for making your voice heard,” he said.

The change was due in part to the backlash from creators who started leaving the platform with numbers.

“You have really successful, hardworking creators who spend a lot of time and work and have a consumer on the other end willing to buy it,” said Mr Gross. “You’ve been seeing articles over and over about how successful it was, and for some reason the outside world doesn’t want it recognized.”

Matthew Camp, an artist who posts gay pornographic content several times a week, said in an interview that he sees the company’s proposed ban as a means of making fraudulent payments to credit card companies that are increasingly uncomfortable with processing pornography-related transactions.

But on Wednesday, the company said it had reached an agreement with payment processors. In a statement emailed to The New York Times, an OnlyFans spokesperson said: “The proposed October 1, 2021 changes are no longer necessary due to bank partners’ assurances that OnlyFans can support all types of creators.”

Dannii Harwood Became the first content creator of OnlyFans in 2016. He has since transferred his work on the camera to running a management company of which more than 200 OnlyFans creators are clients.

According to Ms. Harwood, the site’s founder Tim Stokely and his associates initially had no choice but to change the rules. These credit card companies are very powerful, and while religious conservatives are likely to benefit from their growing reluctance to process pornography payments, there are other legitimate concerns: Porn consumers are among those most likely to object to transactions. Credit card companies also don’t want to inadvertently process payments for materials that would later cause consent issues.

A representative of Mr Stokely did not respond to a request for comment, but on Tuesday The Financial TimesMr. Stokely blamed the banks entirely for the change and said that if the situation with them changed, new bans on sexual content would be lifted.

Ms. Harwood noted that many of OnlyFans’ most successful artists are those who have mastered the art of “teasing and tickling,” not posting obscene content.

He never posted sex on his own feed.

Instead, it started earning more than $50,000 a month from subscriptions and special requests that cost extra. Men paid her to act as daring as answering the door naked and walking around in her underwear.

She chatted with her fans every day via direct messaging, learning about their habits, sexual preferences, and insecurities, becoming someone she likes to call an “online girlfriend.”

“Subscribers move on to the next creator after seeing everything. It’s been proven time and again with my girls,” he said. “I keep telling them: ‘Less is more’.”

But Ms. Harwood did not deny that if the ban had gone as planned, some regular pornographic actors would likely have migrated to other sites.

The largest of these sites is, which currently boasts more than 14,000 confirmed creators, according to founder Dominic Ford.

Mr. Ford, a 46-year-old former gay porn producer and actor, said in an interview that the site is poised to generate around $20 million in revenue this year. He would have loved to take the job that OnlyFans had planned to turn down.

But he faces his own obstacles. It is currently working on plans to request documentation and permission forms for all artists.

“It’s a good thing,” he said, to make things more professional. “We had casts in every movie I made.”

Still, it will need to hire people to handle a lot of paperwork. It will be expensive.

A number of industry players, including Mr. Gross, believe that cryptocurrency will provide a major workaround for payment. But the bulk of most online sites’ revenue comes from automatic, recurring subscriptions. And there is no way to run them through most crypto payment systems. “There’s no towing mechanism in place,” said Mr. Ford.

In light of Wednesday’s announcement, artists may not feel the urgency to switch to other sites so quickly. As for OnlyFans, the decision may have been made with self-protection in mind.

“Do you remember what happened to Tumblr?” Mr Gross referred to the 2018 decision to ban pornography. “Totally irrelevant.”

Mike Isaac contributing reporting.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *