Reporter Laura Foreman, whose romance was scandalous, dies at 76


“I don’t think I’ve done anything wrong,” Ms Foreman told The Inquirer. “I may have done something wrong. Of course, I don’t believe I wrote anything for The Inquirer that violated my own professional integrity.”

The Times said he should resign even though the behavior in question had taken place in another newspaper. In fact, The Times initially said that their work complies with the highest ethical standards. But according to an account by Miss Foreman in The Washington Monthly in 1978, AM RosenthalThe Times’ editor-in-chief told him, as the newspaper was writing harsh stories about conflicts of interest at the time: Bert Lance As a close Carter adviser, he could hardly foster a conflict on his own.

To others, Mr Rosenthal made a memorable comment that was interpreted in a few different ways, but said, in essence, he didn’t care if his reporters had sex with elephants – as long as they weren’t watching the circus.

In Philadelphia, Inquirer editor Mr. Roberts appointed the paper’s top research team. Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele to dive into the matter. They produced a 17,000-word article published on October 16, 1977, revealing internal rivalries in the paper, and discovered that the editors were looking for another way to protect a favorite reporter, Ms. Foreman. He was among the first instances of a newspaper turning its investigative artillery upon itself.

Mr. Roberts soon asked the managing editor, gene foreman – It has nothing to do with Laura – drafting a comprehensive code of ethics was something that very few newspapers had at the time. The new code required staff to report potential conflicts to their managers and take action to eliminate any conflict, for example by changing rhythms. It also banned the widespread practice of accepting “free” from sources and others in news feeds.

Mr. Foreman, author of “The Ethical Journalist,” a university text first published in 2009, said in a phone call that the point was to avoid even giving the impression of a conflict.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *