[ad_1]
World Cup money? As women regularly point out, even if the women won championships and the men struggled to get out of the first round, the men took exponentially more.
The problem with different payment structures, of course, was that they led to different payments. And men almost always got more.
So what has changed?
The new contracts, announced this week, will end the women’s guaranteed pay system and put both veteran teams on a pay-to-play model.
The decision to pursue guaranteed salaries has always been a strategic calculation by women: While men traditionally earned the bulk of their income from club salaries, the emerging women’s professional game — far behind in development – he even offered his stars much lower salaries. Guaranteed incomes from USA Football at the time offered the assurance of a consistent wage and ensured that a female player who was injured or became pregnant would not lose her home or car.
Switching to a pay-to-play model carries some risks for some women: A player who is disgraced and left out of the USA Football payroll may leave the sport without a consistent income beyond the club salary. But the higher match payouts for top players who now get more salaries from club teams, split World Cup payouts with men, and revenue-sharing shares with US Soccer were clearly worth it.
What kind of money are we talking about?
Under the terms of the new deals, which run through 2028, both men and women will receive a bonus of $8,000 for most games just for being called into camp, and a $10,000 bonus for every game they win. For women, this means doubling match wages for more than a dozen games a year.
What’s the result? Projections shown to the women’s team and shared with The New York Times have shown estimated annual payouts of up to $450,000 per year from US Football and potentially double that amount or more after a good World Cup cycle. These numbers should be similar for top male actors.
[ad_2]
Source link