How Did These Vocal Anti Covid Vaccine Chiropractors Divide?


Mr Bogash also expressed his disappointment that “the previous Covid infection was not entirely part of the discussion, despite all the evidence to support the fact that innate immunity is stronger and longer lasting than acquired immunity”. (Research shows that vaccines are more likely to generate stronger and more reliable immunity, especially against variants.)

Without mentioning vaccines, Dawn Benton, vice president of the California Chiropractic Association, said that chiropractors are “well-trained in recognizing conditions beyond our scope so that we can determine when a patient would be best treated in our office or by another person.” Health employee.”

“Given our training,” he said, “there are times when a chiropractor can comment appropriately on many medical issues, and we leave the decision on that to each individual chiropractor and the regulations they apply.”

Of the 11 organizations reached, only two—the Delaware Chiropractic Association and the Washington State Chiropractic Association—directly said chiropractors should refer patients to their medical practitioners for questions about medical issues.

“Providing clinical advice on out-of-scope issues violates a large number of laws and regulations governing healthcare licensing,” said Jeff Curwen, executive director of the Washington association. “Chiropractors can and should discuss with their patients how non-chiropractic treatments can affect their chiropractic care, but they should always refer these patients to the appropriate type of provider for specific answers to out-of-scope questions.”

Still, some practitioners shared false or unsourced information without being asked.

Greg Werner, a chiropractor in New York City and Westchester County, NY, claims on his website that there is no evidence that vaccines work and that the germ theory “does not exist” because “EVERYONE would ALWAYS be sick if they did.” ” (He declined an interview request.)

J. Zimmerman, a New Jersey chiropractor, routinely gave figures on: his blog He cited the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, a federal database where anyone can report health problems after vaccination, and suggested that the reported problems were caused by the vaccines. he didn’t mention CDC’s disclaimer — “Report to VAERS does not mean that the adverse event was caused by the vaccine, it simply means that the adverse event occurred some time after the vaccine” — until The New York Times emailed him questions about the use of VAERS in their article.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *